Slough: I did not - I could not - have killed your son

Slough: I did not - I could not - have killed your son

Paul Slough addresses the court prior to sentencing on April 13, 2024 in Washington D.C. He points out evidence to the court that the ammunition that killed a 9-year old boy was black-tipped and not the ammunition that was issued to, or in the possession of Mr. Slough on September 16, 2024 in Nisur Square, Baghdad, Iraq. 

Read More

Convicted Blackwater Guards’ Families Respond to Sentencing

Convicted Blackwater Guards’ Families Respond to Sentencing

The families of the four convicted guards, highly-decorated veterans who vehemently maintain their own innocence, are gravely disappointed that the judge did not accept their argument that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment renders the sentences imposed unconstitutional. While still upholding the weapons charge with a 30 year mandatory minimum, the Judge did exercise his discretion to provide the most lenient sentence of thirty years and a day. The families of Paul Slough, Evan Liberty, and Dustin Heard still contend that upholding the mandatory minimum sentence is patently cruel and unusual in light of the complete lack of forensic evidence tying any defendant to any alleged victim. 

Read More

Why Did the Administration Want Them in Prison?

Why Did the Administration Want Them in Prison?

One of the first posts we received when this page went "live" was a bit of a push-back on our statement that these men have been "persecuted by the Obama Administration". Their point was that the incident occurred in 2007, prior to Obama being elected. This brings up a great point. While the first prosecution did go forth under President Bush, Judge Ricardo Urbina dismissed the case against the men on December 31, 2009, after he left office.

Read More

NO Jurisdiction

NO Jurisdiction

The emotional part of this case lies in the self-defense issue. To suggest that the men of Raven 23 were wrong for returning fire in Baghdad cuts like a knife into the brave hearts of these men who put it on the line every day and managed to make it home.

The lesser emotional issue is the pure and simple legal issue of jurisdiction. It really is the cornerstone of the entire case.

Read More

Evidence "Handling"

Evidence "Handling"

I want to briefly tell you about the SR-25 rifle given to Nick Slatten.

When this incident turned into a full-blown investigation, they collected all of the Raven 23 weapons. The BW Armorer personally inspected Nick's rifle before he turned it over to the FBI. It functioned fine - no anomalies.

Oddly, when the FBI turned the rifle over to the lab to be tested, suddenly it wouldn't fire. When they finally got it to fire, they said it had a single-stage pull, instead of a double-stage pull.

Read More

FBI Decides What Is "Useless"

FBI Decides What Is "Useless"

Evidence. This is a photo of recovered evidence. The FBI said evidence like this was basically useless, and dismissed because it was weathered and clearly couldn't have been "fresh" (freshly-fired is apparently the same thing to these "experts"), and supported that bit of creative theory with testimony from a witness who said it hadn't rained in Baghdad for quite some time.

Read More

More Photo Evidence

More Photo Evidence

Photo evidence. The truck on the left is the Command Vehicle in which Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Nick Slatten were riding. The enlarged portions of the photo show the size of, and nearly perfectly round, holes/dings received during the engagement. Everyone who knew what they were talking about immediately identified the marks as evidence of incoming rounds. The government, however, in furtherance of their theory (in agreement with the Iraqis) that we did NOT take incoming, put forth evidence and experts who theorized that these marks were made by blowback from our own 203 rounds (which are incendiary and spray tiny '"frags" or tick tack sized fragments) fired at the white car.

Read More